Update -Child Status Protection Act For Diversity Visas – Part 2

As we mentioned in our last article, for Diversity Visas, the general rule is that a person who is 21 years old or above cannot receive derivative status from his/her parent who is Diversity Visa lottery winner for the applicable year. Therefore, this person is considered to be “aged out” and cannot be included with his/her parents’ application for a Diversity Visa.

 

An exception to this general rule is the Child Status Protection Act (CSPA). The purpose of the CSPA is to allow certain family members that just turned 21 years old to remain as “children” under the immigration laws.  By qualifying as a “child,” an applicant who is already 21 can then also apply for the visa with his or her parents. However, this can be a somewhat calculated formula in determining one’s eligibility.

 

To calculate the age for Diversity Visa purposes, one must:

  1. Calculate the age of the child on the date when an immigrant visa number becomes “available” or the approval date, whichever is later; and
  2. Reduce that number by the days the diversity visa petition has been “pending.”

 

We also mentioned in the last article that, when an immigrant visa number becomes available is somewhat unclear. We said that some have interpreted this to mean that the number is available on the first month that one is eligible for an interview. The general definition for when an immigrant visa number becomes available “is the first day of the month of the Department of State (DOS) Visa Bulletin, which indicates availability of a visa for that preference category.”

 

To explain the process again, current case numbers are usually published on the visa bulletin 1-2 months before the interview can/will actually be scheduled. For example, the numbers published in August apply to interviews for October. Therefore, the question last article was whether the number is “available” in August or October. Interpreting the definition above, it would be reasonable to assume that the immigrant visa number becomes “available” in August or October.

 

However, recently we have received information that sheds some light on this “availability” issue, which suggests that (for purposes of the CSPA) Diversity Visa applicant’s case number is considered available in the month that he/she is first eligible for the interview – thus, October (and not August) for the example above. According to a legal division of the Department of State:

 

“Generically speaking, visa availability date is determined by the visa bulletin.  If the visa bulletin indicates that a visa will be available on October 1, then October 1 is the date we must work with.  The fact that the case was prepared prior to that date or that the visa bulletin was published before that date have no bearing on what the date of visa availability is.”

 

As to the second requirement of when a petition is “pending,” the general definition for Diversity Visa purposes is “the first day of the Diversity Visa mail-in period to the date of the letter notifying the principal alien that his or her application has been selected.” Therefore, if the first day to apply for the Diversity Visa lottery was October 1, 2012, and the applicant won and received the winning notification letter dated May 1, 2013, then this period of time is what is to be reduced from the child’s age (213 days or just over 7 months).

 

So what does this all mean? This means that if a Diversity Lottery winner/parent has a child turning 21 on August 1, 2012, and their pending date is about 7 months, then in order to include the child on the application as a derivative, the parent must be eligible for an interview (i.e., case number becomes available) before March 2013. If the parent is still waiting for after March, then the child will now be considered “aged-out” and not be allowed to be issued a visa under the Diversity Visa program.

 

In conclusion, the formula for determining whether a child, who is approaching or at 21 years old, qualifies as a Diversity Visa beneficiary can be complicated, and even some officials at the Embassies and Consulates have trouble making the correct calculations. It is important to remember that even if your child is 21 years old, she may not be 21 years in regards to the Diversity Visa program, under the Child Status Protection Act.

 

All said and explained in this article does not constitute a legal opinion and does not replace legal advice. Responsibility for using the wordings and opinions conveyed in this article relies solely and entirely on the reader.

This article was written by Dotan Cohen Law Offices, working in the field of immigration law in the United States, Canada, Australia and England.

Israel

“I’m very grateful to you for the professional and quick handling my case in receiving the Green Card in a very short time !!”
Amnon Karmi
Family Based Green Card
March 31st, 2018
“I would like to thank you for your great professional work. The papers whom I carried to the interview were impressive and I felt confident that this process will be approved for sure. Best, Ronen Rick”
Ronen Rick
E-1 Work Visa
March 2nd, 2017
DC LAW OFFICES לכבוד משרד עורכי דין אני מבקש להודות לכם על הליווי המדהים שלכם בתהליך קבלת הגרין קארד. הייתם מצויינים. הרגשתי שהיה לי על מי לסמוך בכל נושא לאורך הדרך, איסוף הנתונים, הכנת התיק לשגרירות, לראיון האישי וההתמודדות עם גורמי ראשויות החוק האמריקאים. הייעוץ והיחס היה חם לכל אורך הדרך. המענה שלכם לכל בקשה שלי היה מהיר ועינייני. לכל מי שמצויי בתהליך בקשת גרין קארד או כל התנהלות מול ממשלת ארצות הברית (או ממשלה אחרת) אמליץ בחום על משרד עורכי הדין שלכם. תודה רבה, ד“ר בעז מזרחי
Boaz Mizrahi
DV-2014
March 18 2015
DC LAW OFFICES לכבוד משרד עורכי דין אני מבקש להודות לכם על הליווי המדהים שלכם בתהליך קבלת הגרין קארד. הייתם מצויינים. הרגשתי שהיה לי על מי לסמוך בכל נושא לאורך הדרך, איסוף הנתונים, הכנת התיק לשגרירות, לראיון האישי וההתמודדות עם גורמי ראשויות החוק האמריקאים. הייעוץ והיחס היה חם לכל אורך הדרך. המענה שלכם לכל בקשה שלי היה מהיר ועינייני. לכל מי שמצויי בתהליך בקשת גרין קארד או כל התנהלות מול ממשלת ארצות הברית (או ממשלה אחרת) אמליץ בחום על משרד עורכי הדין שלכם. תודה רבה, ד“ר בעז מזרחי
Boaz Mizrahi
DV-2014
March 18 2015
“This letter is our personal recommendation for Dotan Cohen, Law Offices. In the last year they took care of our Green Card application. We found Dotan and his team very cooperative and very helpful they are professional, we got very detailed answers to our concerns and primarily they are consistently pleasant to work with. We defiantly can say that without the escort we got from Dotan and his team throughout the application process we would never got our Green Card. From our experience we would like to recommend to all the GC applicants if you really want to be a green card holders do not save the cost of a lawyer and hire Dotan Cohen, Law Offices.” Amit M./ DV-2009/ July 28th 2009/ Israel “Thanks very much for your help with my application. The interview was successful and everything ran very smoothly. Your input was very valuable, both while filling the forms and while preparing for the interview. You were thorough, responsive to my many questions, and most importantly, supportive. Thanks again,”
Shaul & Esty S.
DV-2009
November 23rd 2009
“I would like to thank the staff at Dotan Cohen Offices for all their efforts in assisting me to achieve my Green Card. In my case, I needed help in defining my occupation so that I can get my Green Card. If it wasn’t for the experienced lawyers at Dotan Cohen Law Offices, I would not have received my Green Card.”
Yossi C.
DV-2008
August 31st 2008
Bantsi Gafni
Shira Gafni
Another satisfied customer! Shira received American citizenship

I only have a question